Performance
Brookside — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Brookside in Stockton, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
44%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
18%
Exceeded the standard
176
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 55% | 27% | 95 |
| Grade 8 | 31% | 6% | 81 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 65% 507 tested | 61% 507 tested | 44% 176 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 65% 236 tested | 58% 236 tested | 35% 79 tested |
| Male | 66% 271 tested | 64% 271 tested | 51% 97 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 81% 112 tested | 79% 112 tested | 58% 38 tested |
| Black or African American | 45% 40 tested | 30% 40 tested | 29% 14 tested |
| Filipino | 63% 27 tested | 70% 27 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 56% 161 tested | 50% 161 tested | 30% 61 tested |
| White | 68% 124 tested | 68% 124 tested | 51% 39 tested |
| Two or more races | 69% 39 tested | 59% 39 tested | 53% 15 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 55% 245 tested | 46% 245 tested | 30% 91 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 75% 262 tested | 75% 262 tested | 59% 85 tested |
| Homeless | 50% 12 tested | 33% 12 tested | - |
| Military family | 38% 34 tested | 38% 34 tested | 8% 12 tested |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 25% 24 tested | 17% 24 tested | - |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 26% 23 tested | 17% 23 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 87% 47 tested | 70% 47 tested | 47% 19 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 97% 31 tested | 94% 31 tested | 100% 11 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 66% 71 tested | 52% 71 tested | 35% 26 tested |
| Never an English learner | 65% 436 tested | 63% 436 tested | 45% 150 tested |
| English only | 63% 405 tested | 60% 405 tested | 41% 139 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 27% 52 tested | 31% 52 tested | 12% 17 tested |
| No reported disability | 70% 455 tested | 65% 455 tested | 47% 159 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 36% 14 tested | 43% 14 tested | - |
| Parent high school graduate | 42% 50 tested | 26% 50 tested | 14% 21 tested |
| Parent some college | 52% 93 tested | 43% 93 tested | 29% 34 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 68% 166 tested | 61% 166 tested | 52% 63 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 81% 171 tested | 83% 171 tested | 55% 51 tested |
View 16 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not foster youth | 65% 507 tested | 61% 507 tested | 44% 176 tested |
| Not migrant education | 65% 507 tested | 61% 507 tested | 44% 176 tested |
| Not homeless | 66% 495 tested | 62% 495 tested | 45% 173 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 67% 483 tested | 63% 483 tested | 46% 169 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 67% 473 tested | 63% 473 tested | 46% 164 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 48% 104 tested | 42% 104 tested | 21% 42 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 70% 87 tested | 76% 87 tested | 61% 28 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 86% 66 tested | 89% 66 tested | 70% 20 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 70% 57 tested | 65% 57 tested | 47% 19 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 74% 46 tested | 63% 46 tested | 44% 18 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 62% 37 tested | 49% 37 tested | 27% 11 tested |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 41% 32 tested | 28% 32 tested | 23% 13 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 79% 24 tested | 67% 24 tested | - |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 71% 17 tested | 82% 17 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 53% 15 tested | 47% 15 tested | - |
| Parent education declined to state | 50% 12 tested | 50% 12 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
42%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
67%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
55
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 1 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 2 | 14 | 14% | 21% | 21% | 43% | 64% |
| Grade 4 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 6 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 7 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 8 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (26 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 51 | 18% | 16% | 25% | 41% | 67% |
| No Special Education Services | 45 | 18% | 9% | 24% | 49% | 73% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 35 | 20% | 20% | 31% | 29% | 60% |
| Male | 30 | 30% | 13% | 27% | 30% | 57% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 28 | 25% | 21% | 36% | 18% | 54% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 27 | 26% | 22% | 33% | 19% | 52% |
| Female | 25 | 4% | 16% | 24% | 56% | 80% |
| Asian | 20 | 15% | 10% | 15% | 60% | 75% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 20 | 15% | 5% | 15% | 65% | 80% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 16 | 25% | 13% | 13% | 50% | 63% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 15 | 27% | 20% | 20% | 33% | 53% |
| Special Education Services | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Homeless | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| White | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 3 years in program | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Military | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Arabic | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 4 years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 5 years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| LTEL | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Cantonese | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Vietnamese | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.