Performance
Foothills Middle — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Foothills Middle in Arcadia, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
62%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
26%
Exceeded the standard
250
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 8 | 62% | 26% | 250 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 75% 626 tested | 71% 638 tested | 62% 250 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 78% 301 tested | 69% 306 tested | 58% 119 tested |
| Male | 72% 325 tested | 73% 332 tested | 65% 131 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 81% 394 tested | 81% 403 tested | 69% 163 tested |
| Filipino | 82% 17 tested | 76% 17 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 53% 115 tested | 40% 115 tested | 41% 39 tested |
| White | 71% 51 tested | 61% 51 tested | 50% 22 tested |
| Two or more races | 82% 44 tested | 79% 47 tested | 65% 17 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 70% 165 tested | 61% 168 tested | 50% 62 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 77% 461 tested | 75% 470 tested | 65% 188 tested |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 12% 50 tested | 37% 62 tested | 11% 27 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 10% 49 tested | 37% 49 tested | 14% 22 tested |
| English learners, under 12 months | - | 38% 13 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 79% 145 tested | 70% 145 tested | 60% 62 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 92% 119 tested | 91% 119 tested | 77% 52 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 62% 195 tested | 60% 207 tested | 45% 89 tested |
| Never an English learner | 81% 431 tested | 77% 431 tested | 71% 161 tested |
| English only | 77% 312 tested | 71% 312 tested | 68% 109 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 26% 46 tested | 26% 46 tested | 19% 21 tested |
| No reported disability | 79% 580 tested | 75% 592 tested | 66% 229 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 33% 12 tested | 42% 12 tested | - |
| Parent high school graduate | 43% 30 tested | 44% 32 tested | 27% 11 tested |
| Parent some college | 76% 42 tested | 51% 43 tested | 35% 20 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 73% 245 tested | 67% 250 tested | 55% 104 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 83% 282 tested | 84% 283 tested | 81% 101 tested |
View 14 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not foster youth | 75% 626 tested | 71% 638 tested | 62% 250 tested |
| Not homeless | 75% 626 tested | 71% 638 tested | 62% 250 tested |
| Not migrant education | 75% 626 tested | 71% 638 tested | 62% 250 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 75% 623 tested | 71% 635 tested | 62% 248 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 81% 576 tested | 75% 576 tested | 68% 223 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 82% 312 tested | 82% 318 tested | 70% 130 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 80% 82 tested | 74% 85 tested | 67% 33 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 53% 60 tested | 42% 60 tested | 36% 22 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 53% 55 tested | 38% 55 tested | 47% 17 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 84% 38 tested | 80% 41 tested | 73% 15 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 69% 39 tested | 64% 39 tested | 55% 20 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 53% 15 tested | 47% 15 tested | - |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 85% 13 tested | 69% 13 tested | - |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 75% 12 tested | 50% 12 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
23%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
55%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
65
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 17 | 12% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 65% |
| Grade 7 | 18 | 22% | 28% | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| Grade 8 | 30 | 13% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 53% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (22 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Special Education Services | 54 | 19% | 26% | 30% | 26% | 56% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 49 | 10% | 24% | 35% | 31% | 65% |
| Asian | 46 | 13% | 30% | 35% | 22% | 57% |
| Primary language: Mandarin (Putonghua) | 46 | 15% | 30% | 33% | 22% | 54% |
| Male | 43 | 12% | 30% | 33% | 26% | 58% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 38 | 13% | 34% | 32% | 21% | 53% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 27 | 19% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 59% |
| Female | 22 | 23% | 27% | 32% | 18% | 50% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 19 | 0% | 26% | 32% | 42% | 74% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 15 | 27% | 40% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 15 | 27% | 47% | 27% | 0% | 27% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 13 | 15% | 23% | 38% | 23% | 62% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 13 | 15% | 23% | 38% | 23% | 62% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 11 | 27% | 9% | 36% | 27% | 64% |
| Special Education Services | 11 | 0% | 45% | 45% | 9% | 55% |
| LTEL | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 1 year in program | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 5 years in program | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 4 years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Two or more races | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.