Performance
Perdew Elementary — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Perdew Elementary in Etiwanda, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
36%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
14%
Exceeded the standard
118
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 36% | 14% | 118 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 57% 312 tested | 55% 314 tested | 36% 118 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 61% 152 tested | 54% 153 tested | 40% 53 tested |
| Male | 54% 160 tested | 57% 161 tested | 32% 65 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 68% 56 tested | 72% 58 tested | 37% 19 tested |
| Black or African American | 50% 28 tested | 43% 28 tested | - |
| Filipino | 75% 16 tested | 69% 16 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 45% 142 tested | 45% 141 tested | 31% 62 tested |
| White | 83% 35 tested | 67% 36 tested | 36% 11 tested |
| Two or more races | 61% 33 tested | 61% 33 tested | - |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 39% 112 tested | 45% 111 tested | 26% 42 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 67% 200 tested | 61% 203 tested | 41% 76 tested |
| Military family | 63% 16 tested | 63% 16 tested | - |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 24% 42 tested | 39% 44 tested | 14% 14 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 24% 42 tested | 39% 41 tested | 14% 14 tested |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 73% 30 tested | 80% 30 tested | 33% 12 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 70% 20 tested | 75% 20 tested | - |
| Ever an English learner | 44% 72 tested | 55% 74 tested | 23% 26 tested |
| Never an English learner | 61% 240 tested | 55% 240 tested | 39% 92 tested |
| English only | 60% 220 tested | 54% 220 tested | 38% 85 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 18% 40 tested | 23% 39 tested | 22% 18 tested |
| No reported disability | 63% 272 tested | 60% 275 tested | 38% 100 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent high school graduate | 36% 58 tested | 52% 58 tested | 35% 23 tested |
| Parent some college | 52% 67 tested | 43% 67 tested | 22% 27 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 61% 114 tested | 57% 116 tested | 30% 43 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 82% 57 tested | 75% 57 tested | 67% 18 tested |
View 15 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not foster youth | 57% 312 tested | 55% 314 tested | 36% 118 tested |
| Not migrant education | 57% 312 tested | 55% 314 tested | 36% 118 tested |
| Not homeless | 57% 309 tested | 56% 311 tested | 36% 117 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 57% 296 tested | 55% 298 tested | 36% 112 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 62% 270 tested | 58% 270 tested | 38% 104 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 55% 84 tested | 48% 84 tested | 35% 40 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 31% 58 tested | 40% 57 tested | 23% 22 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 74% 39 tested | 76% 41 tested | 33% 12 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 71% 24 tested | 71% 24 tested | - |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 87% 23 tested | 75% 24 tested | - |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 53% 17 tested | 65% 17 tested | - |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 75% 16 tested | 69% 16 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 33% 15 tested | 40% 15 tested | - |
| Black or African American (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 69% 13 tested | 46% 13 tested | - |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 75% 12 tested | 50% 12 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
30%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
69%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
84
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 14 | 14% | 7% | 43% | 36% | 79% |
| Grade 1 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 2 | 13 | 8% | 15% | 54% | 23% | 77% |
| Grade 3 | 11 | 0% | 27% | 45% | 27% | 73% |
| Grade 4 | 20 | 5% | 20% | 45% | 30% | 75% |
| Grade 5 | 16 | 19% | 44% | 13% | 25% | 38% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (25 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 73 | 5% | 25% | 37% | 33% | 70% |
| No Special Education Services | 65 | 8% | 20% | 37% | 35% | 72% |
| Male | 55 | 11% | 24% | 33% | 33% | 65% |
| Asian | 50 | 8% | 18% | 38% | 36% | 74% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 44 | 16% | 20% | 36% | 27% | 64% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 40 | 0% | 25% | 43% | 33% | 75% |
| Female | 29 | 3% | 21% | 52% | 24% | 76% |
| Primary language: Mandarin (Putonghua) | 28 | 14% | 18% | 29% | 39% | 68% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 25 | 8% | 32% | 44% | 16% | 60% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 24 | 8% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 58% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 21 | 10% | 29% | 24% | 38% | 62% |
| Special Education Services | 19 | 11% | 32% | 47% | 11% | 58% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 18 | 0% | 17% | 50% | 33% | 83% |
| Primary language: Punjabi | 14 | 0% | 29% | 50% | 21% | 71% |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 11 | 18% | 27% | 36% | 18% | 55% |
| EL - 3 years in program | 11 | 9% | 27% | 55% | 9% | 64% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 11 | 27% | 9% | 55% | 9% | 64% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 11 | 27% | 9% | 55% | 9% | 64% |
| EL - 4 years in program | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 5 years in program | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Arabic | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| White | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Cantonese | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.