Performance
Joshua Elementary — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Joshua Elementary in Lancaster, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
6%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
0%
Exceeded the standard
101
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 6% | 0% | 101 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 14% 336 tested | 4% 336 tested | 6% 101 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 11% 189 tested | 3% 189 tested | 3% 63 tested |
| Male | 17% 145 tested | 6% 145 tested | 8% 36 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Black or African American | 12% 115 tested | 1% 115 tested | 3% 32 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino | 15% 187 tested | 6% 187 tested | 8% 59 tested |
| White | 25% 12 tested | 8% 12 tested | - |
| Two or more races | 5% 19 tested | 5% 19 tested | - |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 15% 317 tested | 5% 317 tested | 6% 94 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 5% 19 tested | 0% 19 tested | - |
| Homeless | 18% 38 tested | 3% 38 tested | 8% 13 tested |
| Military family | 45% 11 tested | 27% 11 tested | - |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 0% 56 tested | 0% 56 tested | 0% 18 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 0% 56 tested | 0% 56 tested | 0% 18 tested |
| Long term English learners | 9% 11 tested | 0% 11 tested | - |
| At risk of becoming a long term English learner | 0% 20 tested | 0% 20 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 65% 17 tested | 12% 17 tested | - |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 45% 11 tested | 9% 11 tested | - |
| Ever an English learner | 15% 73 tested | 3% 73 tested | 5% 22 tested |
| Never an English learner | 14% 263 tested | 5% 263 tested | 6% 79 tested |
| English only | 12% 252 tested | 5% 252 tested | 1% 71 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 10% 50 tested | 6% 50 tested | 0% 15 tested |
| No reported disability | 15% 286 tested | 4% 286 tested | 7% 86 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 12% 33 tested | 3% 33 tested | - |
| Parent high school graduate | 13% 136 tested | 4% 136 tested | 8% 40 tested |
| Parent some college | 17% 104 tested | 5% 104 tested | 3% 35 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 15% 26 tested | 0% 26 tested | - |
| Parent graduate school | 6% 18 tested | 6% 18 tested | - |
View 10 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not migrant education | 14% 336 tested | 4% 336 tested | 6% 101 tested |
| Not foster youth | 14% 330 tested | 5% 330 tested | 6% 100 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 13% 325 tested | 4% 325 tested | 6% 96 tested |
| Not homeless | 13% 298 tested | 5% 298 tested | 6% 88 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 17% 280 tested | 5% 280 tested | 7% 83 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 16% 174 tested | 6% 174 tested | 9% 54 tested |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 12% 111 tested | 1% 111 tested | 3% 32 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 16% 19 tested | 11% 19 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 5% 19 tested | 5% 19 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 0% 13 tested | 0% 13 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
13%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
44%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
93
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 11 | 0% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 45% |
| Grade 1 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 2 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 3 | 18 | 39% | 44% | 11% | 6% | 17% |
| Grade 4 | 11 | 18% | 18% | 45% | 18% | 64% |
| Grade 5 | 19 | 21% | 26% | 42% | 11% | 53% |
| Grade 6 | 14 | 14% | 43% | 21% | 21% | 43% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (19 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary language: Spanish | 90 | 23% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 42% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 89 | 24% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 43% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 87 | 24% | 30% | 33% | 13% | 46% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 85 | 22% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 46% |
| No Special Education Services | 77 | 13% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 52% |
| Female | 50 | 24% | 30% | 34% | 12% | 46% |
| Male | 43 | 21% | 37% | 28% | 14% | 42% |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 20 | 30% | 20% | 40% | 10% | 50% |
| EL - 3 years in program | 18 | 39% | 33% | 22% | 6% | 28% |
| EL - 5 years in program | 18 | 22% | 28% | 33% | 17% | 50% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 17 | 12% | 35% | 35% | 18% | 53% |
| Special Education Services | 16 | 69% | 25% | 6% | 0% | 6% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 13 | 23% | 38% | 23% | 15% | 38% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 12 | 25% | 17% | 50% | 8% | 58% |
| LTEL | 11 | 18% | 45% | 9% | 27% | 36% |
| EL - 4 years in program | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.