Performance
Pond Elementary — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Pond Elementary in Wasco, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
16%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
0%
Exceeded the standard
38
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 27% | 0% | 15 |
| Grade 8 | 9% | 0% | 23 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 22% 117 tested | 21% 118 tested | 16% 38 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 25% 48 tested | 22% 49 tested | 17% 12 tested |
| Male | 20% 69 tested | 20% 69 tested | 15% 26 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Hispanic or Latino | 20% 107 tested | 19% 108 tested | 17% 36 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 22% 113 tested | 20% 114 tested | 16% 37 tested |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 0% 12 tested | 25% 12 tested | - |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 0% 12 tested | 25% 12 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 26% 42 tested | 17% 42 tested | 11% 18 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 20% 54 tested | 19% 54 tested | 10% 21 tested |
| Never an English learner | 24% 63 tested | 23% 64 tested | 24% 17 tested |
| English only | 22% 58 tested | 22% 59 tested | 25% 16 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 0% 13 tested | 8% 13 tested | - |
| No reported disability | 25% 104 tested | 23% 105 tested | 17% 36 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 33% 18 tested | 33% 18 tested | - |
| Parent high school graduate | 14% 42 tested | 17% 42 tested | 7% 14 tested |
| Parent some college | 26% 23 tested | 17% 24 tested | - |
| Parent college graduate | 21% 14 tested | 29% 14 tested | - |
View 7 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not armed forces family member | 22% 117 tested | 21% 118 tested | 16% 38 tested |
| Not migrant education | 22% 117 tested | 21% 118 tested | 16% 38 tested |
| Not homeless | 22% 116 tested | 21% 117 tested | 16% 37 tested |
| Not foster youth | 22% 115 tested | 20% 116 tested | 16% 38 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 25% 105 tested | 21% 106 tested | 17% 35 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 20% 104 tested | 17% 105 tested | 17% 35 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 23% 13 tested | 8% 13 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
19%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
58%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
31
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 1 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 2 | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 3 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (14 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economically Disadvantaged | 30 | 3% | 37% | 40% | 20% | 60% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 29 | 3% | 38% | 41% | 17% | 59% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 29 | 7% | 34% | 41% | 17% | 59% |
| No Special Education Services | 28 | 7% | 36% | 43% | 14% | 57% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 24 | 4% | 38% | 42% | 17% | 58% |
| Male | 16 | 13% | 38% | 38% | 13% | 50% |
| Female | 15 | 0% | 33% | 40% | 27% | 67% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 2 years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 5 years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.