Performance
Rio del Sol — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Rio del Sol in Oxnard, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
34%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
14%
Exceeded the standard
194
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 41% | 18% | 116 |
| Grade 8 | 22% | 8% | 78 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 57% 558 tested | 43% 558 tested | 34% 194 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 60% 286 tested | 40% 286 tested | 34% 100 tested |
| Male | 53% 272 tested | 46% 272 tested | 33% 94 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 74% 23 tested | 87% 23 tested | 82% 11 tested |
| Black or African American | 38% 16 tested | 38% 16 tested | - |
| Filipino | 81% 42 tested | 57% 42 tested | 45% 11 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino | 50% 372 tested | 35% 372 tested | 25% 135 tested |
| White | 69% 68 tested | 59% 68 tested | 52% 21 tested |
| Two or more races | 74% 35 tested | 54% 35 tested | - |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 52% 337 tested | 33% 337 tested | 29% 133 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 65% 221 tested | 58% 221 tested | 44% 61 tested |
| Homeless | 41% 22 tested | 23% 22 tested | - |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 26% 58 tested | 16% 58 tested | 0% 16 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 25% 57 tested | 16% 57 tested | 0% 16 tested |
| At risk of becoming a long term English learner | 23% 13 tested | 15% 13 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 71% 41 tested | 56% 41 tested | 55% 22 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 70% 20 tested | 45% 20 tested | 45% 11 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 44% 99 tested | 32% 99 tested | 32% 38 tested |
| Never an English learner | 60% 459 tested | 45% 459 tested | 34% 156 tested |
| English only | 59% 439 tested | 45% 439 tested | 33% 145 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 12% 49 tested | 12% 49 tested | 0% 12 tested |
| No reported disability | 61% 509 tested | 46% 509 tested | 36% 182 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 46% 13 tested | 15% 13 tested | - |
| Parent high school graduate | 38% 42 tested | 31% 42 tested | 35% 26 tested |
| Parent some college | 50% 159 tested | 31% 159 tested | 31% 62 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 61% 189 tested | 46% 189 tested | 26% 47 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 68% 145 tested | 59% 145 tested | 49% 47 tested |
View 14 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not armed forces family member | 57% 558 tested | 43% 558 tested | 34% 194 tested |
| Not foster youth | 57% 558 tested | 43% 558 tested | 34% 194 tested |
| Not migrant education | 57% 558 tested | 43% 558 tested | 34% 194 tested |
| Not homeless | 58% 536 tested | 44% 536 tested | 35% 185 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 61% 500 tested | 46% 500 tested | 37% 178 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 45% 244 tested | 25% 244 tested | 20% 98 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 61% 128 tested | 55% 128 tested | 38% 37 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 66% 38 tested | 55% 38 tested | 46% 13 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 73% 30 tested | 63% 30 tested | - |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 74% 27 tested | 63% 27 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 79% 19 tested | 58% 19 tested | - |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 69% 16 tested | 50% 16 tested | - |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 80% 15 tested | 87% 15 tested | - |
| Filipino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 93% 15 tested | 47% 15 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
23%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
59%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
92
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 11 | 9% | 55% | 27% | 9% | 36% |
| Grade 1 | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 2 | 12 | 17% | 25% | 42% | 17% | 58% |
| Grade 3 | 12 | 17% | 50% | 25% | 8% | 33% |
| Grade 4 | 13 | 8% | 23% | 69% | 0% | 69% |
| Grade 5 | 11 | 0% | 9% | 45% | 45% | 91% |
| Grade 6 | 11 | 9% | 18% | 45% | 27% | 73% |
| Grade 7 | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 8 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (20 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 88 | 9% | 32% | 36% | 23% | 59% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 85 | 9% | 34% | 34% | 22% | 56% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 83 | 10% | 35% | 33% | 23% | 55% |
| No Special Education Services | 83 | 6% | 31% | 37% | 25% | 63% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 79 | 10% | 33% | 33% | 24% | 57% |
| Male | 47 | 11% | 34% | 32% | 23% | 55% |
| Female | 45 | 7% | 31% | 40% | 22% | 62% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 23 | 4% | 22% | 26% | 48% | 74% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 16 | 19% | 56% | 19% | 6% | 25% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 14 | 7% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 64% |
| EL - 5 years in program | 14 | 0% | 7% | 64% | 29% | 93% |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 13 | 8% | 23% | 62% | 8% | 69% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 13 | 0% | 31% | 54% | 15% | 69% |
| EL - 3 years in program | 11 | 18% | 55% | 27% | 0% | 27% |
| EL - 4 years in program | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| LTEL | 10 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Special Education Services | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Homeless | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.