Performance
Riverview Middle — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Riverview Middle in Bay Point, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
9%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
1%
Exceeded the standard
236
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 8 | 9% | 1% | 236 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 21% 672 tested | 9% 674 tested | 9% 236 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 22% 317 tested | 9% 319 tested | 12% 120 tested |
| Male | 20% 354 tested | 10% 354 tested | 7% 115 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 37% 27 tested | 21% 28 tested | 17% 12 tested |
| Black or African American | 21% 73 tested | 7% 73 tested | 13% 23 tested |
| Filipino | 48% 23 tested | 32% 22 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 19% 484 tested | 8% 485 tested | 9% 172 tested |
| White | 27% 15 tested | 13% 16 tested | - |
| Two or more races | 16% 44 tested | 5% 44 tested | 7% 15 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 20% 604 tested | 9% 603 tested | 10% 218 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 32% 68 tested | 15% 71 tested | 6% 18 tested |
| Homeless | 7% 14 tested | 6% 16 tested | - |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 3% 271 tested | 2% 277 tested | 0% 88 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 3% 258 tested | 2% 258 tested | 0% 84 tested |
| English learners, under 12 months | 0% 13 tested | 0% 19 tested | - |
| Long term English learners | 1% 148 tested | 2% 149 tested | 0% 57 tested |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 45% 168 tested | 17% 166 tested | 15% 74 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 38% 26 tested | 42% 26 tested | - |
| Ever an English learner | 19% 439 tested | 8% 443 tested | 7% 162 tested |
| Never an English learner | 24% 233 tested | 13% 231 tested | 15% 74 tested |
| English only | 22% 207 tested | 9% 205 tested | 12% 68 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 3% 122 tested | 1% 121 tested | 0% 42 tested |
| No reported disability | 25% 550 tested | 11% 553 tested | 11% 194 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 9% 66 tested | 2% 66 tested | 6% 18 tested |
| Parent high school graduate | 19% 140 tested | 8% 144 tested | 10% 39 tested |
| Parent some college | 17% 71 tested | 10% 70 tested | 14% 28 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 31% 52 tested | 19% 53 tested | 8% 24 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 40% 20 tested | 21% 19 tested | - |
View 13 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not migrant education | 21% 672 tested | 9% 674 tested | 9% 236 tested |
| Not foster youth | 21% 669 tested | 9% 671 tested | 9% 235 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 21% 667 tested | 9% 669 tested | 9% 234 tested |
| Not homeless | 21% 658 tested | 9% 658 tested | 9% 233 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 19% 443 tested | 8% 442 tested | 9% 159 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 33% 401 tested | 15% 397 tested | 15% 148 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 22% 323 tested | 9% 322 tested | 9% 122 tested |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 21% 63 tested | 8% 63 tested | 14% 21 tested |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 16% 43 tested | 5% 43 tested | 7% 15 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 24% 41 tested | 12% 43 tested | 0% 13 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 27% 22 tested | 18% 22 tested | - |
| Filipino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 50% 14 tested | 29% 14 tested | - |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 15% 13 tested | 8% 13 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
13%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
36%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
282
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 6 | 84 | 39% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 25% |
| Grade 7 | 105 | 29% | 28% | 23% | 21% | 44% |
| Grade 8 | 93 | 25% | 39% | 26% | 11% | 37% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (25 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 263 | 26% | 36% | 24% | 14% | 38% |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 255 | 28% | 36% | 22% | 13% | 36% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 249 | 29% | 35% | 24% | 12% | 36% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 247 | 29% | 35% | 24% | 12% | 36% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 220 | 18% | 41% | 27% | 14% | 41% |
| No Special Education Services | 213 | 28% | 31% | 25% | 15% | 40% |
| LTEL | 151 | 21% | 44% | 25% | 9% | 34% |
| Male | 149 | 34% | 33% | 19% | 14% | 34% |
| Female | 133 | 27% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 38% |
| Special Education Services | 69 | 38% | 41% | 16% | 6% | 22% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 27 | 56% | 7% | 30% | 7% | 37% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 19 | 89% | 5% | 5% | 0% | 5% |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 19 | 26% | 32% | 21% | 21% | 42% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 18 | 89% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 6% |
| Asian | 14 | 50% | 14% | 14% | 21% | 36% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 14 | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| EL - 2 years in program | 13 | 69% | 8% | 8% | 15% | 23% |
| Homeless | 11 | 82% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 9% |
| Two or more races | 11 | 45% | 18% | 9% | 27% | 36% |
| EL - 3 years in program | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Vietnamese | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 5 years in program | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Filipino | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Filipino (Pilipino or Tagalog) | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.