Performance
Dr. Augustine Ramirez Intermediate — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Dr. Augustine Ramirez Intermediate in Eastvale, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
48%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
15%
Exceeded the standard
622
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 8 | 48% | 15% | 622 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 70% 1,210 tested | 52% 1,209 tested | 48% 622 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 74% 627 tested | 50% 628 tested | 41% 321 tested |
| Male | 65% 583 tested | 55% 581 tested | 54% 301 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 83% 344 tested | 75% 346 tested | 66% 171 tested |
| Black or African American | 56% 95 tested | 36% 94 tested | 30% 46 tested |
| Filipino | 87% 63 tested | 71% 63 tested | 70% 37 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino | 62% 431 tested | 37% 430 tested | 36% 223 tested |
| White | 68% 211 tested | 52% 210 tested | 45% 110 tested |
| Two or more races | 60% 57 tested | 39% 57 tested | 38% 29 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 64% 713 tested | 46% 713 tested | 43% 358 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 77% 497 tested | 62% 496 tested | 53% 264 tested |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 15% 65 tested | 15% 67 tested | 8% 25 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 20% 50 tested | 14% 50 tested | 6% 18 tested |
| English learners, under 12 months | 0% 15 tested | 18% 17 tested | - |
| Long term English learners | 14% 14 tested | 0% 14 tested | - |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 83% 196 tested | 72% 196 tested | 65% 104 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 81% 83 tested | 72% 83 tested | 69% 42 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 66% 261 tested | 57% 263 tested | 54% 129 tested |
| Never an English learner | 71% 949 tested | 51% 946 tested | 46% 493 tested |
| English only | 70% 866 tested | 49% 863 tested | 44% 451 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 23% 80 tested | 13% 79 tested | 12% 34 tested |
| No reported disability | 73% 1,130 tested | 55% 1,130 tested | 50% 588 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 33% 21 tested | 24% 21 tested | - |
| Parent high school graduate | 53% 117 tested | 36% 118 tested | 29% 55 tested |
| Parent some college | 62% 180 tested | 38% 181 tested | 36% 102 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 73% 518 tested | 56% 518 tested | 52% 269 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 79% 324 tested | 65% 321 tested | 56% 163 tested |
View 18 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not armed forces family member | 70% 1,210 tested | 52% 1,209 tested | 48% 622 tested |
| Not migrant education | 70% 1,210 tested | 52% 1,209 tested | 48% 622 tested |
| Not foster youth | 70% 1,209 tested | 52% 1,208 tested | 48% 622 tested |
| Not homeless | 70% 1,205 tested | 53% 1,204 tested | 48% 620 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 73% 1,145 tested | 55% 1,142 tested | 49% 597 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 55% 290 tested | 31% 289 tested | 33% 150 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 78% 211 tested | 72% 213 tested | 64% 98 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 76% 141 tested | 50% 141 tested | 44% 73 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 67% 140 tested | 57% 139 tested | 47% 70 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 92% 133 tested | 80% 133 tested | 67% 73 tested |
| Black or African American (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 53% 75 tested | 32% 74 tested | 26% 35 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 69% 71 tested | 44% 71 tested | 43% 40 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 58% 50 tested | 34% 50 tested | 40% 25 tested |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 84% 32 tested | 81% 32 tested | 79% 19 tested |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 50% 32 tested | 34% 32 tested | 40% 15 tested |
| Filipino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 90% 31 tested | 61% 31 tested | 61% 18 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 72% 25 tested | 44% 25 tested | 36% 14 tested |
| Black or African American (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 65% 20 tested | 50% 20 tested | 45% 11 tested |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
33%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
54%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
69
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 42 | 29% | 14% | 19% | 38% | 57% |
| Grade 8 | 27 | 30% | 22% | 22% | 26% | 48% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (18 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economically Disadvantaged | 65 | 29% | 18% | 20% | 32% | 52% |
| No Special Education Services | 55 | 33% | 11% | 20% | 36% | 56% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 53 | 17% | 17% | 23% | 43% | 66% |
| Asian | 38 | 39% | 11% | 16% | 34% | 50% |
| Female | 37 | 27% | 19% | 22% | 32% | 54% |
| Primary language: Mandarin (Putonghua) | 33 | 39% | 9% | 15% | 36% | 52% |
| Male | 32 | 31% | 16% | 19% | 34% | 53% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 30 | 13% | 30% | 27% | 30% | 57% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 29 | 14% | 24% | 28% | 34% | 62% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 27 | 11% | 22% | 26% | 41% | 67% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 17 | 65% | 24% | 12% | 0% | 12% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 16 | 69% | 19% | 13% | 0% | 13% |
| LTEL | 15 | 20% | 20% | 20% | 40% | 60% |
| Special Education Services | 14 | 14% | 43% | 21% | 21% | 43% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 3 years in program | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 2 years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.