Performance
Serrano Intermediate — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Serrano Intermediate in Lake Forest, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
50%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
19%
Exceeded the standard
408
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 8 | 50% | 19% | 408 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 57% 837 tested | 47% 848 tested | 50% 408 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 58% 419 tested | 43% 427 tested | 44% 214 tested |
| Male | 56% 418 tested | 52% 421 tested | 55% 194 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 87% 79 tested | 80% 82 tested | 79% 43 tested |
| Black or African American | 38% 16 tested | 38% 16 tested | 33% 12 tested |
| Filipino | 80% 25 tested | 64% 25 tested | 73% 15 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino | 37% 376 tested | 27% 381 tested | 29% 176 tested |
| White | 68% 261 tested | 58% 264 tested | 56% 121 tested |
| Two or more races | 79% 77 tested | 73% 77 tested | 83% 41 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Economically disadvantaged | 36% 417 tested | 29% 427 tested | 29% 200 tested |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 77% 420 tested | 66% 421 tested | 70% 208 tested |
| Homeless | 27% 99 tested | 22% 107 tested | 23% 52 tested |
| Military family | 39% 18 tested | 39% 18 tested | - |
| English learners | |||
| English learners | 0% 64 tested | 5% 75 tested | 0% 27 tested |
| English learners, 12 months or more | 0% 60 tested | 2% 60 tested | 0% 24 tested |
| English learners, under 12 months | - | 20% 15 tested | - |
| Long term English learners | 0% 33 tested | 0% 33 tested | 0% 15 tested |
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 44% 200 tested | 38% 200 tested | 33% 102 tested |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 76% 33 tested | 61% 33 tested | 58% 12 tested |
| Ever an English learner | 33% 264 tested | 29% 275 tested | 26% 129 tested |
| Never an English learner | 67% 573 tested | 56% 573 tested | 60% 279 tested |
| English only | 67% 540 tested | 56% 540 tested | 60% 267 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 17% 71 tested | 11% 71 tested | 21% 29 tested |
| No reported disability | 60% 766 tested | 51% 777 tested | 52% 379 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent not a high school graduate | 19% 70 tested | 15% 72 tested | 6% 34 tested |
| Parent high school graduate | 28% 118 tested | 18% 119 tested | 17% 53 tested |
| Parent some college | 47% 127 tested | 35% 127 tested | 37% 60 tested |
| Parent college graduate | 71% 263 tested | 62% 267 tested | 65% 133 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 80% 206 tested | 71% 208 tested | 73% 107 tested |
View 16 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not migrant education | 57% 837 tested | 47% 848 tested | 50% 408 tested |
| Not foster youth | 57% 834 tested | 47% 845 tested | 50% 408 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 57% 819 tested | 48% 830 tested | 50% 400 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 61% 773 tested | 51% 773 tested | 53% 381 tested |
| Not homeless | 61% 738 tested | 51% 741 tested | 53% 356 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 29% 289 tested | 20% 294 tested | 20% 134 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 77% 191 tested | 64% 192 tested | 61% 88 tested |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 63% 87 tested | 52% 87 tested | 57% 42 tested |
| White (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 44% 70 tested | 43% 72 tested | 42% 33 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 92% 63 tested | 89% 63 tested | 91% 32 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 84% 55 tested | 75% 55 tested | 90% 30 tested |
| Parent education declined to state | 30% 53 tested | 22% 55 tested | 19% 21 tested |
| Two or more races (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 68% 22 tested | 68% 22 tested | 64% 11 tested |
| Asian (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 69% 16 tested | 53% 19 tested | 45% 11 tested |
| Filipino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 85% 13 tested | 69% 13 tested | - |
| Filipino (Econ. Disadvantaged) | 75% 12 tested | 58% 12 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
32%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
66%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
94
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 7 | 55 | 22% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 64% |
| Grade 8 | 39 | 15% | 15% | 38% | 31% | 69% |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (21 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economically Disadvantaged | 85 | 18% | 16% | 36% | 29% | 66% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 79 | 11% | 16% | 34% | 38% | 72% |
| No Special Education Services | 78 | 21% | 14% | 28% | 37% | 65% |
| Hispanic or Latino | 77 | 21% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 66% |
| Primary language: Spanish | 77 | 21% | 14% | 30% | 35% | 65% |
| EL - 6+ years in program | 56 | 2% | 9% | 41% | 48% | 89% |
| Female | 50 | 22% | 14% | 34% | 30% | 64% |
| Male | 44 | 16% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 68% |
| Homeless | 37 | 41% | 8% | 27% | 24% | 51% |
| LTEL | 28 | 0% | 18% | 32% | 50% | 82% |
| Special Education Services | 16 | 13% | 19% | 63% | 6% | 69% |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 15 | 60% | 7% | 33% | 0% | 33% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 14 | 64% | 7% | 29% | 0% | 29% |
| Primary language: All remaining languages | 12 | 17% | 25% | 50% | 8% | 58% |
| EL - 1 year in program | 11 | 64% | 18% | 18% | 0% | 18% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Asian | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| White | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 3 years in program | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| At-Risk of LTEL | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 2 years in program | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.