Performance
Springhill Elementary — Academic Performance
Standardised assessments, graduation outcomes and college-readiness metrics for Springhill Elementary in Lafayette, California.
Headline Indicator
—
Data not yet captured
Science (CAST)
California Science Test, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard, 2025
CAASPP
64%
Met or exceeded the standard
2025
32%
Exceeded the standard
77
Students tested
| Grade | Met or exceeded | Exceeded | Tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 5 | 64% | 32% | 77 |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP science results for 2025. Percentages are of students with a reported score. Results for very small groups are suppressed by the state and show as -.
Results by Student Group
CAASPP 2025, percentage meeting or exceeding the standard for each reported student group
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| All students | 83% 229 tested | 85% 229 tested | 64% 77 tested |
| Gender | |||
| Female | 85% 109 tested | 82% 109 tested | 65% 34 tested |
| Male | 81% 118 tested | 89% 118 tested | 63% 43 tested |
| Race and ethnicity | |||
| Asian | 91% 33 tested | 94% 33 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 81% 21 tested | 81% 21 tested | - |
| White | 77% 111 tested | 81% 111 tested | 57% 47 tested |
| Two or more races | 89% 63 tested | 89% 63 tested | 64% 14 tested |
| Socioeconomic status | |||
| Not economically disadvantaged | 83% 221 tested | 85% 220 tested | 64% 73 tested |
| English learners | |||
| Reclassified fluent English proficient | 92% 12 tested | 92% 12 tested | - |
| Initial fluent English proficient | 92% 13 tested | 92% 13 tested | - |
| Ever an English learner | 65% 17 tested | 72% 18 tested | - |
| Never an English learner | 84% 212 tested | 86% 211 tested | 65% 72 tested |
| English only | 83% 199 tested | 86% 198 tested | 63% 67 tested |
| Disability | |||
| Students with disabilities | 52% 33 tested | 55% 33 tested | - |
| No reported disability | 88% 196 tested | 90% 196 tested | 66% 67 tested |
| Parent education | |||
| Parent college graduate | 74% 68 tested | 79% 67 tested | 71% 17 tested |
| Parent graduate school | 87% 153 tested | 88% 154 tested | 62% 58 tested |
View 9 further student groups reported by the state
| Student group | English Language Arts | Mathematics | Science |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not foster youth | 83% 229 tested | 85% 229 tested | 64% 77 tested |
| Not homeless | 83% 229 tested | 85% 229 tested | 64% 77 tested |
| Not migrant education | 83% 229 tested | 85% 229 tested | 64% 77 tested |
| Not armed forces family member | 82% 225 tested | 85% 225 tested | 64% 77 tested |
| Fluent English proficient and English only | 84% 224 tested | 87% 223 tested | 65% 75 tested |
| White (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 76% 110 tested | 82% 109 tested | 59% 46 tested |
| Two or more races (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 90% 60 tested | 90% 60 tested | 69% 13 tested |
| Asian (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 93% 29 tested | 93% 29 tested | - |
| Hispanic or Latino (Not Econ. Disadvantaged) | 81% 21 tested | 81% 21 tested | - |
Source: test_scores, CAASPP 2025 student group breakdown. Groups the state suppresses for privacy, or that are too small to report, show as - rather than zero. Groups overlap, so the figures do not sum to the all students row.
English Learner Proficiency (ELPAC)
English Language Proficiency Assessments for California, summative overall performance, 2025
2025
40%
Level 4, well developed
The level used towards reclassification
2025
70%
Level 3 or 4, moderately or well developed
20
English learners tested
| Grade | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindergarten | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Grade 1 | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
Level 1 Minimally developed. Level 2 Somewhat developed. Level 3 Moderately developed. Level 4 Well developed.
View ELPAC by student group (15 groups)
| Student group | Tested | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Level 3 or 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Special Education Services | 16 | 6% | 13% | 38% | 44% | 81% |
| Not Economically Disadvantaged | 16 | 0% | 13% | 38% | 50% | 88% |
| ELs enrolled 12 months or more | 13 | 8% | 23% | 23% | 46% | 69% |
| Male | 12 | 8% | 25% | 25% | 42% | 67% |
| EL - less than 1 year in program | 9 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Female | 8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| EL - 1 year in program | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| ELs enrolled fewer than 12 months | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Hispanic or Latino | 7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Spanish | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| White | 6 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Primary language: Russian | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Two or more races | 5 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Economically Disadvantaged | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Special Education Services | 4 | - | - | - | - | - |
Source: school_elpac, California Department of Education summative ELPAC 2025. Percentages are of English learners with a reported overall performance level. Grades and groups too small to report are suppressed by the state and show as -, which is not the same as zero.
Sources: state assessment files (EDFacts), school_graduation_v2 (NCES adjusted-cohort), school_sat_act + CRDC SAT/ACT.